Saturday, November 30, 2024

Sex and feeling

“Women are systematically degraded by receiving the trivial attentions which men think it manly to pay to the sex, when, in fact, men are insultingly supporting their own superiority.”

—Mary Wollstonecraft

 

By Alex P. Vidal

 

 

IN many parts of the world today, sex has become a commercial commodity that can be experienced even with the absence of a serious relationship commitment.

Some of the sexual revolution ideology stated that it was old-fashioned to want to connect sex with feelings—it meant we weren’t “hip.” 

Not only marriage but monogamy and love or even tender feelings were often considered to be something only “neurotic” women wanted.

The idea was that “people should spontaneously have sex and not worry about hurting each other, just behave freely and have sex, no strings, anytime with anybody, just for pure physical pleasure.”

But almost no woman in the study conducted by Shere Hite, an American-born German sex educator, wanted that kind of sexual relationship very often—although a few thought that they should:

“I saw a TV show the other night and this guy said we need to separate sex and love and I think he is right—that is why women get hurt so much because men for some reason seem to be able to do this while we have a great deal of trouble separating them. At least I don’t seem to be able to.”

According to Hite, whose sexological work has focused primarily on female sexuality, “Overwhelmingly, women wanted sex with feeling.” 

 

TESTIMONIES

 

Here are some of the testimonies of the respondents in Hite’s study published in The Hite Report:

ALMA: “I think the sexual revolution is fantastic. But I have remained ‘faithful’ to my husband and will because I know from past experience that sex with me is totally involved with personal relationship. It’s part of me that I can’t separate from the rest of my body and mind. I could not successfully divide my sexual life among two or more.”

ROSE: “I think the sexual revolution has totally distorted the place of sexuality to the point that it has become an end in itself, an escape, or a desperate attempt to achieve love. Writers like Rollo May (Love and Will) and the women’s movement have helped me to value the integration of love and sex as opposed to casual encounters with partners who do not value me.”

DEBBIE: “Well, I like being able to have a sexual life even though I am not married. But I do not like the casual and ‘cool’ sort of relationship as well as what used to be called ‘romance.’ I like to feel involved with someone.”

RUTH: “I approve of the acceptance of sexual desires and relations. But personally I still believe it is more desirable to have a personally intimate and close relationship, not a casual one.”

REBECCA: “Where I see trouble is in people of my generation, many of my friends.  In their attempts to be freed by the sexual revolution they have undertaken sexual practices they are not psychologically equipped to handle. In joining groups gropes and multiple sexual encounters they seem to mess up their lives…leave their partners and families for all the wrong reasons…become middle-aged hippies, as though we could ever be twenties again. 

“They seem confused and definitely not content. This older group has simply forgotten that sex should be a thing that fits in nicely with a lot of other things like a good nourishing one-to-one relationship, work, personal growth, strengthening friendships, going fishing and watching sunsets. 

“I get the feeling they’ve thrown out all the commitments, not just the bad ones, and sex has become the mainspring of their every waking moment. 

“The sexual revolution has permitted me to share home and life with a man without marrying, and it gave me the right to choose my way of life without having to be a flag-carrying rebel about it, but if I were not to pick and choose within this revolution to suit myself, to avoid damaging myself…then I would not have been freed by the so-called revolution either; they’ve just exchanged one kind of slavery for another. 

“Without doubt though, more good than harm has come of it, and my generation will pass out of it in time anyway.”

 

SUPPLEMENT

 

TIFFANY: “I like sex a lot. But it can only supplement a warm affectionate, mutually respecting, full personhood relationship. It can’t be a relationship. It can’t prove love. It can’t prove anything. I have found sex with people I don’t really like, or who I’m not certain will really like me, or with people I don’t feel I know well, to be very shallow and uncomfortable and physically unsatisfying. 

“I don’t believe you have to be ‘in love’ and married ‘till death do us part.’ But mind and body are one organism and all tied up together, and it isn’t even physically fun unless the people involved really like each other.”

JESSICA: “The sexual revolution is great. But as an individual I feel I could not have sex except with someone I loved. And if I felt such love I’d want it permanently (as permanent as anything can be). I am even at 53 a romantic idealist—Damn it!”

JANE: “Because I’m very sensitive and afraid of getting hurt (I’m only 18), I still imbue intercourse with very strong emotional meaning. It upsets me and leaves me unhappy to be with someone who views intercourse casually and feels no meaningful tenderness afterwards.”

PAULA: “My emotions play an enormous part in sex for me—maybe too much for my liking. I sometimes feel that I’m too ‘particular,’ or selective or delicate—I have to be feeling very intensely, or in love, or overwhelmed by sexual feelings in order to enter a deep sexual encounter. Sometimes I worry about whether the man will expect too much from me, sometimes whether I will expect too much from him.

“Sometimes I worry about whether I won’t feel enough, or will be disappointed afterwards. At times I have gone out to have a totally casual encounter just to avoid these complications. Most of my relationships—maybe all—begin with a combination of the physical and emotional. I can’t get turned on to a partner without an emotional or mental factor being present, even if not primary. And sometimes it is primary, and the physical secondary.”

DONNA: “I think the sexual revolution has caused a lot of suffering. People use it to avoid commitment; they refuse to work a relationship, preferring to search for the ‘perfect’ love. They fantasize their way through relationships, always seeking perfection, running scared at the first sign that work is needed to help two people together.

“No one knows where the other person is at, and what attracts one may turn off another. Everyone wants to try everything, but not stick to any one thing, so they change from day to day, and are bewildered by the way they and their friends reverse opinions and trade partners. 

“I’m not saying the old way was better, but I’m afraid of what kind of life I can look forward to. I’m not married, but even if I do get married it seems that my marriage has a small chance of surviving. And I don’t see the advantages of this style, frankly.”

ELAINE: “I’m confused as hell about the ‘sexual revolution.’ My husband and I lived and slept together for over a year before we were married—and that was fine. We loved each other and there was some kind of commitment between us. The summer before I was married, my (then) fiancĂ© was away and I slept twice with another man because I was curious. Fine. 

“As I mentioned earlier, I lost my virginity to a friend, a bit of a cold way to start out, but I was scared and wanting to get laid, so he helped me out. Fine. 

“But extra-marital sex, after a man and a woman have made a big commitment to each other—I can’t buy. I moved out on my husband when he took on a girl friend because I couldn’t stand the pain. A year later, right now, we’re negotiating. We seem to be at a stalemate. I hate to think of myself as behind the times, but I just can’t hack anything but monogamy.”

 

GREATEST

 

HELEN: “I still believe the greatest sexual satisfaction comes from having a partner you care about. I’ve gone through stages of having several lovers and thinking I was really liberated. But I’m much more fulfilled now with one caring partner.”

MICHELLE: “I went along with the sexual revolution quite a while until I realized that holding my feelings back was causing me lots of anguish. I was very depressed. I tried opening communications line up—that was part of the problem, but not all of it. Now, in love with my lover and trusting him, I can see how all that damaged me—made my trust mechanisms inhibited by sex. 

“For a while I stopped having sex with him because I couldn’t love and fuck him both. These days things are much better. I think that the loyalty is important.”

MARY: “It’s an overreaction and after years and years of the old double standard, of women expected to be pure and virginal for marriage and to always set the limits, society has overturned itself.

“Now women are supposed to be willing, ready, and able to have sex with anyone, anytime, no strings attached and so on. Out of the latter swing of the pendulum have come some good opening ups of certain repressive taboos. 

“But women, and men, remain oppressed by these roles. I have found that I can’t detach myself from sex and still enjoy it. I can’t make love with someone I’m not supposed to trust—and feel good about it.

“These attitudes don’t treat me like a whole person either. Too much mind/body separation results in either compulsive screwers or strained virgins!”

BERNADETTE: “I have mixed feelings about the sexual revolution. Hedonism seems the opposite side of the coin of Puritanism.  My daughters tell me that they feel used and abused and refused promiscuity, although they have had sex with young men they cared about. I personally hate the singles scene. It makes me feel like a walking cunt!”      

SOPHIA: “I guess I like the idea of intercourse—two people’s bodies joined in an act of love or mutual excitement or whatever, but I’ve become so disillusioned by the whole thing—having met and fucked with a lot of guys who (as I came to realized later) just wanted to get laid and liked the looks of my body but wanted little or nothing to do with me.

“I have come to regard sex as exploitative—having sex is almost like saying ‘here, fuck me, do anything with me that you want, I’m not worth anything anyway.’

“I guess I’m sort of screwed sexually, my ideas about sex are screwed up, and I hope my therapy will help me there. I’ve found I have a lot of guilt feelings and a refusal to enjoy sex, or at least that is what my therapist says.”

 


Wednesday, November 13, 2024

Christianity’s shocking myths

“I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else."

--C. S. Lewis

 

By Alex P. Vidal

 

I WAS born and baptized a Christian. My basic education in religion was about Christianity, about Jesus Christ as the "Son of God" our "Savior who died for our sins."

My education further brought me to Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Taoism, Zoroastrianism, among other primitive religions.

Then came Gandhi, a Hindu, who allegedly said “he loved Jesus but not the Christians.” Other Christians parried Gandhi by saying “they loved the famous Indian pacifist but not Hinduism". A tit for a tat.

But the most earthshaking discovery I consider as the "shockers of all shockers" are reportedly the myths about my religion.

Do we agree or believe the following myths?

1. Christians force their morality on others.

-According to this myth, Christians are judgmental and act as society’s moral watchdogs. And they try to censor everything from the arts to sex education.

2. Christians suppress women.

-According to this myth, the church through the ages has stifled the voice and gifts of women and has treated women as second-class beings.

3. Christians caused the ecological crisis.

-According to this myth, the Christian religion is alienated from the natural world. The Bible says to subdue the earth, and Western Christian culture took that as a license to exploit nature.

4. Christians are anti-scientific.

-According to this myth, the church has historically suppressed learning in general and scientific inquiry in particular. Christians even promote pseudoscience by trying to force science to fit a literal interpretation of the Bible.

5. Christians have done terrible things in the name of Christ.

-This myth cited the wrongs that have been done in the name of Christianity—everything from the Crusades to televangelist scandals.

 

DESTROY

 

6. Christian missionaries destroy native cultures.

-According to this myth, Christian missionaries force indigenous peoples to give up their unique culture. Christians don’t respect the spiritual value in native customs and religions.

7. Christians are arrogant.

-According to this myth, all religions teach basically the same thing, but Christians insist their religion is the only one that’s right. They arrogantly claim that Jesus Christ is the only way to God. That may be true for Christians, but it isn’t true for everybody.

Freelance writers Dale and Sandy Larsen of Duluth, Minnesota, ask if Christianity is defensible amid these myths.

“Isn’t it a backward religion based on primitive ideas that have no place in today’s world? Isn’t the Bible hopelessly out of date? And yet Christians insist on forcing their morality on other people!” they intone.

“And worst of all, isn’t Christianity the cause of so much pain and suffering in the world—from destroying native cultures to suppressing women to causing the ecological crisis?

“How can anyone take seriously a religion that is promoted by sleazy televangelists and that once sponsored the Crusade?

 

QUESTIONS

 

“These are honest questions that deserve straightforward answers. Separating the beliefs and actions of some Christians from our Christianity can be difficult. We need to go below the surface, see how these problems developed historically and go back to the Bible for the full story.”

They believe that there is “element of truth” in the above-mentioned myths.

“Some Christians are arrogant. Some Christians have made their faith into an exclusive club. But God’s forgiveness always reaches out to be inclusive, touching everyone who acknowledges need and and responds in faith to his mercy,” the conclude. “Anyone who has been hurt by Christians’ arrogance will need to summon extra courage and open-mindedness in order to take another serious look at Christianity.”

We must examine our heart. Are we willing not only to look at Christian faith but to find it true and begin to live by it?

Let’s examine the heart of Christian belief.


Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Worry no more

“I always lose the election in the polls, and I always win it on election day.”

—Benjamin Netanyahu

 

By Alex P. Vidal

 

CANDIDATES in next year’s Philippine midterm elections—local and national—shouldn't allow themselves to be distracted by the “results” of surveys commissioned by legitimate or shady outfits, especially survey firms that spring to life only during the election seasons.

In Iloilo, surveys may become irrelevant for the first time; many outfits may be “out of business” now that most of the rivalries for local positions aren’t anymore expected to produce fire and brimstone.

If not token opposition candidates, the names of challengers for governor, city mayor, congressional offices are almost synonymous to the Sesame Street alphabets.

Whether they "lag behind" or "leading", these surveys do not necessarily spell doomsday or ensure the victory of any candidate during the day of reckoning.

 

-o0o-

 

If the results say candidate so and so is trailing by a certain percentage, it can be only tantamount to a mosquito bite for the embattled candidate but with no immediate life-threatening harm.

If the results show a certain candidate is "winning by a wide margin", it can only be an equivalent to a Shiatsu massage in the “winning” candidate's ego but with no actual majestic trip to Shangri-La.

There were cases though when bogus surveys yielded positive results after the election for narcissistic or egomaniac bets especially if the other camps didn't do their homework and were snoring during the frenetic mind game.

This is where the mosquito bite can turn fatal.

In fact, surveys--legit or not—were sometimes utilized only by spin doctors and wheeler-dealers working for one candidate to out-psych and befuddle their rivals.

It's actually a form of mind-conditioning.

In some cases, candidates who get favorable results or those who stand to benefit from the lutong Macao surveys don’t have any idea or aren’t tipped off by handlers hammering out the inside job.

 

-o0o-

 

Some undecided voters cast their lot for the "sure winners" (according to the dubious surveys) even if they actually fancy the other candidates--on second thought—but are only influenced by the surveys.

We’ve covered local and national elections since after democracy was restored in the Philippines in 1986 up and could count with our fingers the number of candidates who emerged victorious after "topping" the surveys.

Many survey "winners" had no inkling the surveys weren’t commissioned by independent professional groups but were instead paid for by their sneaky handlers.

When the election results showed they were waylaid by a mile, that’s when they realized they had been given false hopes or taken for a ride.

The late Timoteo "Nene" Consing always made the late Mansueto “Mansing Malabor eat the dust in various surveys during the mayoral contest in Iloilo City in 1992, but Malabor routed him in actual election.

Former assemblyman Salvador "Buddy" Britanico clobbered the late former justice secretary Raul Gonzalez in the "surveys" for congressman in Iloilo City's lone district in 1998, but the former tanodbayan trounced him when the smoke was cleared.

 

-o0o-


The late former ambassador Danding Cojuangco was one of the most consistent top notchers in the 1992 presidential election.

The former Marcos crony "beat" the late Fidel V. Ramos, the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago, the late Ramon Mitra, the late Jovito Salonga, and Imelda Marcos in the surveys that popped out left and right weeks before the election day.

Joe De Venecia, who never lost in the "surveys" for president in 1998, lost by six million votes to the winner, Joseph “Erap” Estrada.

The late Fernando Poe Jr. routed former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in various surveys but lost by a thin margin during the “Hello Garci”-tainted 2014 presidential contest.

Even polling results in the more advanced and sophisticated United States fizzle out. Nothing seems accurate when it comes to pre-election forecasting; in fact, nothing is perfect.

Thus, candidates in the May 2025 midterm elections should focus on their campaign and stick to strategies, not on surveys. They must wait until after the biggest and final "survey" has concluded that’s on election day, which is only hours after all the votes have been officially counted.

 

-o0o-

 

SAVING OUR PLANET: Don't dispose. Whenever we can, let's swap our throw-away, disposable items for reusable versions. We won't have to pay out repeatedly plus we will avoid contributing to landfill.

HETEROPHOBIA is a fear of the opposite sex. So where will the heterophobics intend to live? In other planets?

(The author, who is now based in New York City, used to be the editor of two daily newspapers in Iloiloi.—Ed)