“No violence, gentlemen--no violence, I beg of you! Consider the furniture!”
― Arthur Conan Doyle
By Alex P. Vidal
NEW YORK CITY -- Friendship ends where attraction to sex objects begins.
There are quarrels among some macho du jours in government that are job-related and not necessarily sparked by a tug-of-war on nymphets like in the case of playboys Bebot Alvarez and Tonyboy Floirendo.
We recall an incident I witnessed as a capitol beat reporter in Iloilo 27 years ago.
The brawl between then deputy governor Ruben Bermudo and provincial tourism chief Manny Benedicto at around 11 o'clock in the morning on July 3, 1990 exploded while DYRI "Radyo Agong" reporter Arsenio "Kamlon" Ang and this writer were doing interview inside the governor's office with Vice Governor Robert "Bob" Maroma, then the acting governor.
There were only five of us inside the governor's office present-- Maroma, Bermudo, Benedicto, this writer, and Ang, who had just won a labor case in the Supreme Court against the defunct DYRP "Radyo Tagring."
DAGGER
Even before the interview with Maroma started, we noticed Benedicto and Bermudo, then in their mid-50's, swapping dagger looks like Crassus and Spartacus.
At one moment, Bermudo removed his eyeglasses like Eddie Garcia to plant a sharp stare at Benedicto, who reciprocated with his own Pacquito Diaz-style look.
While Maroma was answering our questions, the two disappeared surreptitiously. They entered inside the conference room about four meters away on Maroma's right side.
Minutes later, we heard a loud commotion.
The noise didn't stop Maroma from talking but our eyes--Maroma's, Ang's, and mine--started to exchange tacit signals alternately like actors in a silent movie.
When the conference room's divider started to shake violently and two angry voices dished unprintable, Maroma stood up and rushed to the scene.
I grabbed my camera and followed suit. Kamlon scrambled to prepare a tape recorder.
THROATS
Inside, we saw two gladiators literally holding each other's throats on one hand, and throwing rabbit punches on the other hand.
The sight was reminiscent of two Tokyo Dome somo wrestlers.
Blows rained from all angles--a chaotic scene.
Maroma tried to separate the two but was in awkward position, and could receive one of the flying fists on the face if he forced the issue.
So determined were the two Capitol bigwigs to maim each other they refused to let go of their grips--Benedicto's shaking fingers came closed to drilling holes on Bermudo's neck; Bermudo locked Benedicto's jaw with a tight Steven Segal grip.
Both were gasping for breath like sprinters in the 100-meter dash, their false teeth threatening to jump out.
Maroma lost balance on his second attempt to act as third man in the ring.
PHOTOS
Instead of taking photos, I grabbed Benedicto's hand to prevent his fingers from committing cannibalism.
Having lost much energy, he obliged.
Bermudo, also fighting for air in his lungs, let go of Benedicto's jaw--but not after leaving some souvenirs on his skin.
"Tama na ina!" (That's enough)," Maroma, who was himself losing some energy--and patience, shouted while scratching his head in disgust.
When the smoke had cleared, the protagonists could manage to release Mona Lisa-like smiles as if King Kong did not vandalize their mangled faces.
Either the pain from their violent physical activity did not yet take its toll, or they were ashamed for acting like kindergarten pupils and tried to suppress it.
No arrest was made even as Maroma hinted of slapping the misbehaving officials with administrative cases.
Kamlon, who hit a jackpot with his tape recorded "eye-witness account", had a field day repeatedly playing the violent episode to friends and politicians, including Bermudo and Benedicto, who just grinned to hide their embarrassment.
MISS RP-GUAM
We found out their conflict emanated from the province's preparations for the arrival of the Miss Philippines-Guam in Iloilo that year.
As tourism boss, Benedicto, of Dumangas, Iloilo, begrudged the decision of Bermudo, who hails from Maasin, Iloilo, to bypass his authority and disapprove some items in the budget, among other reasons.
If there was one person so terribly upset and mournful that awful morning, it was neither Benedicto nor Bermudo, who had kissed and made up.
It was Maroma, whose interview with us had been cut off unceremoniously, thus he failed to deliver an important message to people as news the following day was dominated by the skirmish of his warring subalterns.
Showing posts with label #Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez. Show all posts
Sunday, April 2, 2017
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
An over acting speaker
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law" -- WINSTON CHURCHILL
By Alex P. Vidal
NEW JERSEY -- I find the call of Philippine House Speaker Pantaleon "Bebot" Alvarez to investigate the alleged plot by former US Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg to oust President Rodrigo Duterte not only funny but OA (over acting).
Alvarez's call was prompted by a report on December 27 by the Manila Times that Goldberg has allegedly left a “blueprint” on how and why Duterte should be kicked out or a “recommendation to the US State Department for the removal of the Philippine President from office.”
Alvarez was quoted in the news as saying, “If true, this has serious consequences not only on our country’s political stability but also on the economic and social fabric of our nation. It would also have grave repercussions on our relationship with the United States."
Alvarez added: “In view of this serious allegation I am calling for a congressional investigation to find out if there is basis to this reported ouster plot against President Rodrigo Duterte."
If true, but how true?
SOURCE
In that news, writer Dr. Dante Ang, publisher of Manila Times, quoted only "a source".
In fact, the title of the story already revealed everything: "US ex-envoy plotting Duterte fall – source."
The story did not have direct allusion to any US Embassy official in Manila or Lisbon, Portugal, the news' dateline. No direct quote from any former or concurrent Goldberg subaltern.
No official statement from the US State Department. Only a source. Ang's "source" outlined or summed up Goldberg's alleged "strategic recommendation ostensibly to the State Department for the ultimate removal of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte from office."
News is news. A source can either be credible or sham. A source can either be true or poisonous. It can be a molehill that became a mountain when translated into straight news.
Not everything that is reported in the newspapers though warrant a congressional investigation. If reporters invoke "sources" in their stories, our legislative body can't resort to knee-jerk reaction if it finds the media stories "alarming."
RESOURCE
If Alvarez will call for a House probe on the allegation, who will they call as resource speakers? Not the Americans, of course.
Not Dr. Dante Ang. Not the employees of Manila Times.
Ang can never be compelled to reveal his source or sources. The Supreme Court has ruled that any journalist can't be obligated, compelled, or coerced in any forum to name his sources.
This will shield credible sources "who requested strict anonymity for fear of retribution or retaliation."
The law also protects journalists from self-incrimination just like the ordinary citizens.
If invited by Alvarez's House investigation committee, we doubt if Ang will cooperate.
The Americans, as well as those who have no love lost for President Duterte, will only laugh while over-acting Alvarez, et al waste the people's money in a House investigation that will reveal nothing.
-o0o-
The wisdom of having three branches in a democratic government is to have a check and balance.
This explains why the executive, legislative, and judiciary are co-equal in the government structure.
The president can't execute any major executive fiat without concurrence from congress. The president have the veto powers if it finds the law passed by congress lacking in substance and inefficient.
If the court finds the acts of the executive and legislative branches to be unlawful, it can always interfere by invoking the legal parameters.
The speaker of the House can be a political sympathizer or ally of the president, but he can't use his office to act as mouthpiece of the executive body.
By Alex P. Vidal
NEW JERSEY -- I find the call of Philippine House Speaker Pantaleon "Bebot" Alvarez to investigate the alleged plot by former US Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg to oust President Rodrigo Duterte not only funny but OA (over acting).
Alvarez's call was prompted by a report on December 27 by the Manila Times that Goldberg has allegedly left a “blueprint” on how and why Duterte should be kicked out or a “recommendation to the US State Department for the removal of the Philippine President from office.”
Alvarez was quoted in the news as saying, “If true, this has serious consequences not only on our country’s political stability but also on the economic and social fabric of our nation. It would also have grave repercussions on our relationship with the United States."
Alvarez added: “In view of this serious allegation I am calling for a congressional investigation to find out if there is basis to this reported ouster plot against President Rodrigo Duterte."
If true, but how true?
SOURCE
In that news, writer Dr. Dante Ang, publisher of Manila Times, quoted only "a source".
In fact, the title of the story already revealed everything: "US ex-envoy plotting Duterte fall – source."
The story did not have direct allusion to any US Embassy official in Manila or Lisbon, Portugal, the news' dateline. No direct quote from any former or concurrent Goldberg subaltern.
No official statement from the US State Department. Only a source. Ang's "source" outlined or summed up Goldberg's alleged "strategic recommendation ostensibly to the State Department for the ultimate removal of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte from office."
News is news. A source can either be credible or sham. A source can either be true or poisonous. It can be a molehill that became a mountain when translated into straight news.
Not everything that is reported in the newspapers though warrant a congressional investigation. If reporters invoke "sources" in their stories, our legislative body can't resort to knee-jerk reaction if it finds the media stories "alarming."
RESOURCE
If Alvarez will call for a House probe on the allegation, who will they call as resource speakers? Not the Americans, of course.
Not Dr. Dante Ang. Not the employees of Manila Times.
Ang can never be compelled to reveal his source or sources. The Supreme Court has ruled that any journalist can't be obligated, compelled, or coerced in any forum to name his sources.
This will shield credible sources "who requested strict anonymity for fear of retribution or retaliation."
The law also protects journalists from self-incrimination just like the ordinary citizens.
If invited by Alvarez's House investigation committee, we doubt if Ang will cooperate.
The Americans, as well as those who have no love lost for President Duterte, will only laugh while over-acting Alvarez, et al waste the people's money in a House investigation that will reveal nothing.
-o0o-
The wisdom of having three branches in a democratic government is to have a check and balance.
This explains why the executive, legislative, and judiciary are co-equal in the government structure.
The president can't execute any major executive fiat without concurrence from congress. The president have the veto powers if it finds the law passed by congress lacking in substance and inefficient.
If the court finds the acts of the executive and legislative branches to be unlawful, it can always interfere by invoking the legal parameters.
The speaker of the House can be a political sympathizer or ally of the president, but he can't use his office to act as mouthpiece of the executive body.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)