Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Alex P. Vidal Quotes: Snake

 “If you have to kill a snake, kill it once and for all.”

--JAPANESE PROVERB:

“A snake can never be our friend. It can pretend to be a friend, but once a snake will always be a snake: traitor and wicked both in appearance and character. We can trust and forgive the nincompoop, but not the snake.”

--ALEX P. VIDAL


Alex P. Vidal Quotes: Harmony

He who lives in harmony with himself lives in harmony with the universe.”

--MARCUS AURELIUS :


 “He who is always at odds with his neighbors, officemates, classmates, board mates, relatives, colleagues even under normal times, will soon be at odds with almost anybody in the world, including the mosquitoes, termites, ants, spiders, butterflies.”

--ALEX P. VIDAL


Alex P. Vidal Quotes: Money, Health, Reputation

“The worst thing that can happen to a man is to lose his money, the next worst his health, the next worst his reputation.”

--SAMUEL BUTLER : 


“If we lose our money, we can still recover it through hard work and luck. If we lose our health, our life would be in grave danger but we continue to live. But if we lose our reputation, we might find it useless to stay alive because life becomes meaningless.”

—ALEX P. VIDAL 

Blank state

"I have always thought that the actions of men are the best interpreters of their thoughts."

—John Locke  

 

By Alex P. Vidal

 

TO better understand tabula rasa, we must read part of John Locke's Essay concerning Human Understanding.

I got interested about this English empiricist, who was best regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers.

Locked influenced our favorite philosopher, Voltaire, and his contributions to classical republicanism and liberal theory are reflected in the United States Declaration of Independence.

We sometimes mistook Locke for Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a French romanticist who authored The Social Contract, a book that theorized the best way in which to set up a political community in the face of the problems of commercial society.

 

SIMPLER

 

Tabula rasa is one of the simpler great ideas which means "blank slate," which, according to certain philosophers, is the original state of the human mind.

Locke studied the origin of ideas and their relationship to reality in the Essay concerning Human Understanding. He theorized that all ideas come from experience and that knowledge is simply relations among ideas.

Locke's theory tells us we can't have ideas until we have experiences, so in effect the newborn's mind is empty. He called it "white paper" (tabula rasa literally "erased tablet" predates him and suggests, contrary to his doctrine, that something was once there to be erased).

Author Michael Macrone explained that the upshot of Locke's "white paper" is that not only are we born without concrete ideas, but we also lack abstract concepts such as morality, God, and freedom. "Such things must be learned, as language is, and they are learned either by experience or by reflection and reason. These views lead Locke to reject idealism and the whole notion of innate ideas in favor of common-sense philosophy," explained Macrone.

 

UNDERSTANDING

 

Though reason has its place in human understanding, Locke said, it doesn't dominate experience. Mind is not over matter, because matter, through experience, provides the mind with ideas.

"Our simplest and most basic concepts (such as 'loudness,' 'hardness,' and 'sweetness') are furnished by sense, and all more concrete ideas are built upon them," Macrone explained.

"Other ideas come to us through reflection, including awareness of our own thought processes; 'thought' itself as well as 'perception,' 'belief,' 'consciousness,' 'doubt,' and so on are furnished by reflective experience. That such ideas are simple, however, doesn't mean they're innate."

The doctrine of tabula rasa derives mostly from simple logic. If we are all born with an innate idea of God, then we would all have the same idea of God. But of course we don't. Similarly, if we were born with the idea of moral right, we would all agree on what is right and what is wrong. But we don't.

 

ANALYTIC

 

Macrone stressed: "Analytic truths such as 'whatever is, exists' and '2+2=4' are not ideas obvious to everyone--for example children and idiots."  Locke also thought the premises if rationalism--mind over matter--were much too complex to be useful or valid. Like Occam, Macrone emphasized, Locke thought simpler is better, and any account of knowledge that doesn't require innate ideas is simpler.

While tabula rasa seems a simple idea, Locke's argument ends up rather complicated. He sometimes contradicts himself and is eventually forced to admit that certain "faculties" must be innate.

Among these, Macrone pointed out, are the five senses and the capacity to reason, which do count as "ideas" in some circles. Whatever the difficulties of his argument, Macrone said it did not steer British philosophy into what remains its characteristic empiricism.

He failed to convince the French, however, who by and large remain rationalists. Just another reason so many English worry over European union and the Channel Tunnel.


Something most members of male species won’t admit

"The masculine energy was about survival. The male was the hunter who risked his life and had to be in the fight-flight mode."

DEEPAK CHOPRA

By Alex P. Vidal

"IS there such thing as male menopause, sir?" asked Ronalyn, a mass communication student at Iloilo St. Paul University, inside the editorial room of Sun.Star Iloilo, a daily newspaper I once edited.
"Female menopause yes, but male menopause I haven't heard of that yet," I honestly replied to Ronalyn. "Since I am a newsman and not a doctor, we might as well consult the experts on the subject matter: the doctors." 
Days later, I found an article that could help provide the answer to Ronalyn's question: Dr. Tito Garrido's article about male menopause.
Garrido admitted that most Filipino males would not admit they also have menopause. 
The mere mention of the very idea that men experience a form of menopausal change will still draw amusement and laughter, according to the doctor.

CONCEPT

"But this concept has been around as early as 1950s and it has recently enjoyed more attention and credibility," Garrido explained in his column "At Your Service" at the defunct The Philippine Post dated July 14, 1999.
Garrido defined male menopause as "a crisis of confidence identified in the middle aged men, comparable with menopause in women, but thought to be caused by psychological factors such as fear of aging."
The doctor explained further: "Undoubtedly, a part of the controversy as to whether there is indeed such a thing, stems from the misleading use of the term menopause. Derived from the Greek word 'menses,' it refers to the cessation of a woman's monthly menstrual cycle. 'Andropause,' which relies on the Greek work for a man, Andro, is the most commonly accepted term, defined as the natural cessation of the sexual function of older men."
Garrido explained that some authors see it more broadly as "a biological an biochemical condition that has psychological, physical and emotional components." Viropause/andropause is a naturally occurring psychological state that occurs in men's middle years, producing feeling of unhappiness and undermining men's sense of self worth, identity, and competence, stressed Garrido.

PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SIDES

The doctor said endocrinologists have pointed out that in men, there is nothing as traumatic as in the case of women--there is no one period, no striking change to indicate a drop in hormonal levels. 
However, research indicates that men to experience this phenomenon, gradually producing less and less of the male sex hormone, testosterone, as they age. 
In most cases, this progressive decline occurs from age 20 to 80 years.

EMOTIONAL SIDE

These various hormonally-induced physical and behavioral changes is now generally perceived to be the underpinning of this male menopause, or andropause, he explained.
"But this is only part of the equation," Garrido wrote, "for there are also profound emotional aspects as well. It is at this transitional stage of life that a psychological stock-taking, often triggered by biological changes, usually occurs. The reflection on one's life can also be triggered by other physical factors such as an illness like high blood pressure or heart attack, receding hairline, greying hair, or some forms of sexual dysfunction."

MID-LIFE CRISIS

He further stressed: "Other less tangible precipitating factors can include retirement or financial stress, or becoming a grandfather for instance. This process can then lead to stress and unhappiness, or what is more commonly referred at as a mid-life crisis." If a man discovers that he can't attain his goals and then discovers that his body isn't as reliable and as strong as it used to be, the effects of male menopause are compounded."
He warned that most men do indeed manage this transition well, but for those that do not, they often start experimenting with life, making major life-altering changes. 
"This is where the classic stereotype of the middle-aged man dumping his wife in favor of his twentysomething secretary comes into play," Garrido emphasized. "It is a phenomenon that is described in psychological terms as 'fusion with younger body' in a futile effort to regain his lost youth."

MANAGEMENT

In severe cases in which a man experiences abnormally low testosterone levels, hormone replacement therapy maybe the answer, but many medical practitioners see this only as a last resort, Garrido observed.
"In some cases, simply minimizing psychological and physical stress, reducing alcohol intake and stopping smoking for instance, may help," he suggested. "In short, attending to the needs of the physical body is healthy, the others aspects fall into line."
On the psychological side, acceptance of aging is crucial--adopt the attitude that you're not getting older, you're getting better, he volunteered. "Value your wisdom over physical prowess and re-evaluate your goals and what you already have and try and bring them closer together," Garrido asserted. "And most of all, accept that the dreams of your youth were probably unrealistic, rework these dreams so that they may continue to inspire you, but in a more realistic context."
Garrido warned: "Andropause does not take place in a vacuum. While the male is coping with these changes, the spouse is undergoing even more dramatic changes with her own menopause. The good doctor says that if both partners do not realize what is happening and make adjustments to life and thought, the crisis of middle age need not be that much of a crisis."

Can we trust each other?

"If you have a secret, people will sit a little bit closer." 

—ROB CORDDRY 


By Alex P. Vidal

TRUST remains to be the most important aspect of any meaningful relationship.
"More specifically, it is a mutual condition that must exist between a manager and his subordinates, a husband and wife, and between friends," writes Dr. Jan Halper, author of Quite Desperation.
Halper warns that a husband who doesn't trust his wife to listen and be supportive will not disclose his personal thoughts and feelings. If he doesn't trust her judgment, he will not confide in her. 
"As a result, they will grow apart. A manager who doesn't trust his subordination will not delegate responsibility or authority. Instead he will resort to controlling them," Halper stresses. 
"When employees don't feel trusted they are likely to become territorial, derisive, and antagonistically competitive."

SEARCH

In his book Man's Search for Himself, Rollo May discusses the destructive aspects of this attitude:
--this type of individual competitiveness--in which for you to fail in a deal is as good as for me to succeed, since it pushes me ahead in the scramble up the ladder--raises many psychological problems. It makes every man interpersonal hostility and resentment, and increases greatly our anxiety and isolation from each other.
Raised with a competitive spirit, where winning is more important than caring, competition more important than friendship, men search for their opponents' vulnerable points to be used as ammunition in the future, explained Halper.
Halper cites the case of investment banker Anthony Rich, who tells him, "I store confidences away to be used at a later date, if it's to my advantage. Any bit of knowledge is fair game to be used against your perceived enemy in order to declare a victory." 
Although Rich did not admit it, Halper says the implication was there: "It's okay to betray someone you treat as a friend if it means winning or losing."

COMPETITIVENESS

Consequently, this intense competitiveness and desire to win breed fear and distrust between men, according to Halper.
Halper said in general, men are discouraged from "opening their kimono" with one another. They are told to never count on anyone but themselves. Halper found that when he encouraged men to talk with one another about their haunting conflicts and issues, that which was troubling them suddenly seemed less important or disappeared.
"They unburdened themselves of feeling vulnerable by exposing their private side and finding someone who understood them," he points out. "Most often the men I interviewed were shocked at how a simple step could alleviate their loneliness and pain and provide clarity and insight."
Although there is some truth to the assertion that men distrust others because they themselves can't be trusted, another important factor comes into play, Harped said. 

CONTROL

"Men don't believe they are in control of their feelings, that they choose to feel as they do. Instead they think feelings are something that come over them, that they are made to feel as they do by a mysterious external force," explains Halper. "They attribute the power and ability to others, believing someone else made them feel fear, hurt, happiness, or anger."
Men fear getting close to anyone, women or men, because it's another way they might put themselves on the line, becoming vulnerable, asserted Halper.
"Countless men told me they longed to be close to others, but if it meant feeling out of control, they didn't want anything to do with intimacy," he notes.

Don’t let friends exercise solo

 WHY FRIENDS SHOULDN'T LET FRIENDS EXERCISE SOLO. Natalie Gingerich says that working out a deux can make a tough routine feel easier.

A University of Oxford study found that exercisers tolerated discomfort better when working out in a group, compared with doing it alone.

Researchers believe partner workouts may heighten levels of hormones such as endorphins that boost mood and block pain signals.

HEART DISEASE AND DIABETES. Lack of sleep is associated with higher levels of stress hormones that may raise blood pressure and affect glucose metabolism. A new study found that the risk for high blood pressure among insomniacs who slept less than 5 hours per night was 500 times greater than those who logged more than 6 hours.

SLEEP! IT'S NON-NEGOTIABLE. I was bed-ridden because of colds as a result of less sleep these past weeks. I just learned from Health News & Trends that a good night's sleep isn't just about hitting the ground running in the morning.

If we get 7 to 9 hours experts advise, we can expect these added benefits, said Catherine Winters.

ABOUT EDUCATION. Careful, dear students: Education can make you lonely. Academics are single more often than people without degrees. The reason: They often spend their evenings working overtime.


Man and his future

"Men can not afford to be a naturalist, to look at Nature directly, but only with the side of his eye. He must look through and beyond her." 

--HENRY DAVID THOREAU


By Alex P. Vidal

Imaginative naturalist, Dr. Loren Eiseley admits in The Immense Journey there were days when she finds herself "unduly pessimistic" about the man's future.
"Indeed, I will confess that there have been occasions when I swore I would never again make the study of time a profession," she explains. 
"My walls are lined with books expounding its mysteries, my hands have been split and raw with grubbing into the quicklime of its waste bins and hidden crevices. I have stared so much at death that I can recognize the lingering personalities in the faces of skulls and feel accompanying affinities and repulsions."
She says one such skull lies in the lockers of a great metropolitan museum. It is labeled simply: Strandlooper, South Africa. 


LONGER

"I have never looked longer into any human face than I have upon the features of that skull. I come there often, drawn in spite of myself. It is a face that would lend reality to the fantastic tale of our childhood," Eiseley adds. 
"There is a hint of Well's Time Machine folk in it--those pathetic, childlike people whom Wells pictures as haunting earth's autumnal cities in the far future of the dying planet."
Yet the skull has not been spirited back to us through future eras by a time machine, according to her describing it as "a thing, instead of the millennial past. 
It is a caricature of modern man, not by reason of its primitiveness but, startlingly, because of a modernity outreaching his own. It constitutes, in fact, a mysterious prophecy and warning."
For the very moment in which students of humanity have been sketching their concept of the man of the future, that being has already come, and lived, and passed away, explains Eiseley.


CURIOUS

"We men of today are insatiably curious about ourselves and desperately in need of reassurance. Beneath our boisterous self-confidence is fear--a growing fear of the future we are in the process of creating," she explains. 
"In such a mood we turn the pages of our favorite magazine and, like as not, come straight upon a description of the man of the future."
She suggests that the descriptions are not pessimistic; they always, with sublime confidence, involve just one variety of mankind--our own--and they are always subtly flattering.
"In fact, a distinguished colleague of mine who was adept at this kind of prophecy once allowed a somewhat etherealized version of his own lofty brow to be used as an illustration of what the man of the future was to look like. Even the bald spot didn't matter--all the men of the future were so bald, anyway," Eiseley writes.


SCHOLARS

In the minds of many scholars, she points out, a process of "foetalization" is one of the chief mechanisms by which man of today has sloughed off his ferocious appearance of a million years ago, prolonged his childhood, and increased the size of his brain. "Foetalization" or "pedomorphism," as it is termed, means simply the retention, into adult life, of bodily characters which at some earlier stage of evolutionary history were actually only infantile. Such traits were rapidly lost as the animal attained maturity, she observes.
"If we examine the life history of one of the existing great apes and compare its development with that of man," Eiseley explains, "we observe that the infantile stage of both man and ape are far more similar than the two will be in maturity."
At birth, according to her, we have seen, the brain of the gorilla is close to the size of that of the human infant. Both newborn gorilla and human child are much more alike, facially, than they will  ever be in adult life because the gorilla infant will, in the course of time, develop an enormously powerful and protrusive muzzle. She says the sutures of his skull will close early; his brain will grow very little more.


BRAIN

By contrast, she adds, human brain growth will first spurt and then grow steadily over an extended youth. Cranial sutures will remain open into adult life. Teeth will be later in their eruption. Furthermore, she elaborates, the great armored skull and the fighting characters of the anthropoid male will be held in abeyance.
Eiseley says modern man retains something of his youthful gaiety and nimble mental habits far into adult life. The great male anthropoids, by contrast, lose the playful friendliness of youth. In the end the massive skull houses a small, savage, and often morose brain.
"It is doubtful whether our thick-skulled forerunners viewed life very pleasantly in their advancing years," she observes.

Let’s be fair to all bar examinees

Let’s be fair to all bar examinees and call spade a spade, this time.

It’s not fair and proper to hear that about 900 of the 3,962 passers in the 2024 bar exam were “pasang awa.” 

There is no such animal as “pasawang awa” in the bar exam. Every examinee, in fact, deserves to pass given their sacrifices and dedication that no ordinary examinee in any other exams can match. 

Let’s not misinterpret Bar Committee chair Associate Justice Mario Lopez’s words when he elucidated that “they allowed 900 more passers because the country needs more lawyers especially in the countryside” and “instead of 75, which I proposed, the good (Supreme Court) justices—headed by the chief justice—voted unanimously to adopt a grade of 74 as a passing grade.” 

Congratulations to all the 10,387 examinees. 

Thank God for Holiday Season

WE aren’t supposed to ask personal favors from God that will instantly benefit us when we pray. 

In our silent communications, we should first and foremost thank Him for all our blessings. 

Showing or paying back kindness and doing good to others are the best means of paying back God’s love and kindness. 

Christmas Season or normal days, we must continue to appreciate and value our friendship and promote kindness and love. We must love one another. 

I mean it from the bottom of my heart. Merry Christmas 2024 and Happy New Year 2025.

Short wishes for 2025

AS I WRITE THIS, 2024 is “fighting for its dear life” in the cosmology’s Intensive Care Unit (ICU). 

In 2025, let’s 1. Be healthy (eat more vegetables and fruits); 2. Earn an honest and decent living (beg only if it’s a matter of life and death); 3. Be positive (again); 3. Don’t expect too much (in order to avoid pain and frustration).

4; Don’t avoid toxic characters (because it’s impossible and hyperbole to think we can). Deal with them rationally and humanely; 5. Don’t envy the success and popularity of others both in the social media and in real life.

6. Accept that the world’s population is aging rapidly and we age with it each year (therefore it’s normal to have wrinkles, forgetful mind, etc.); 7. Don’t waste (hard earned) money; 8. Never neglect our spritiual needs (we don’t live by food and sex alone) even if we aren’t religious.

9. Always choose (to work and deal with) humans over Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated technologies; 10. Prioritize our families; 11. Love God unconditionally.

Saturday, December 28, 2024

Sex is good until it earns a bad reputation

“Love is something far more than desire for sexual intercourse; it is the principal means of escape from the loneliness which afflicts most men and women throughout the greater part of their lives.”

Bertrand Russell

 

By Alex P. Vidal

 

SEXUAL behavior has been often judged by clergymen whose qualifications include their solemn renunciation of sexual intercourse.

“Tragically, those who undertake to control our sexual destinies are often sexually sick themselves,” protests Dr. David Reuben in Beyond the Birds and Trees.

“The decency league dedicated to abridging sexual behavior—except on their terms—are simply trying to deprive others of the reasonable use of their sexual orgasms.”


Reuben adds: “Every one of us has made that seven-inch journey through the penis into the vagina to meet the other half of our future protoplasm and has then settled in the uterus for the 280-day wait. There is no reason now to be ashamed of how we traveled and where we grew—there is no more suitable place.”

In Any Woman Can, Reuben, a psychiatrist and sex expert who lived in California, says sex started with the crocodile.

“This scaly cold-blooded distant relative of man was the first animal to develop a penis. Before then, life was much simpler. All the earth’s inhabitants had about the same type of sexual equipment and used it about the same way.”

This was how Reuben explained further:

The male and female simply backed up to each other, wiggled their sexual equipment into contact, and oozed primitive sperm into contact with primitive eggs.

There wasn’t much to see, hardly anything to feel, and in many species if a couple turned on like this once a year, it was sufficient. Twice a year was oversexed and many animals copulated only once in a lifetime.

 

VISIBLE

 

For one thing penis was visible. Secondly, it revolutionized sex by fitting inside the female body. In those days there was no such thing as a vagina. The female sexual equipment was a cloaca consisting of a common channel for urine, feces, and semi-annual eggs. (Things have improved a lot for women since then.)

Obviously, the crocodile penis too has undergone major design modifications as it was handed down over the years to homo sapiens. From the evolutionary point of view the modern American male sports the latest in phallic equipment. But problem still remained.

Men equipped with this wonderful organ quickly developed a lively interest in the female sexual apparatus, by then improved and expanded into a closely-coupled vagina, labia, and clitoris.

Like the crocodiles before them men and women discovered that combining their sexual resources resulted in immense pleasure for both contributors.

For the next 50,000 years all went well. Sex was a normal psychological function as routine as swimming had been to the crocodile and as essential and enjoyable as eating was to early man. Then came the Dark Ages.

About 400 A.D. Western civilization abruptly lurched in a different direction. Suddenly sex was out and guilt was in.

As some long-forgotten genius in the field of medieval motivational psychology discovered, men and women are unbelievably responsive to the liking up of sex and guilt.

From that moment on, the fate of society (and most of its members) was sealed. The most efficient means of controlling human behavior had been put into effect: focus on an activity which everybody must engage in—sex; select its most joyable aspect—copulation; finally provide the threat of severe and relentless punishment for its enjoyment.

As the machinery of sexual repression creaked into action, the power and influence of those in control grew enormously. There were, to be sure, a few hitches at first but all resistance finally yielded to the crushing force of sexual repression.

 

PROBLEMS

 

One of the major early problems was that the moralists actually underestimated the potential of their new weapon to change the destiny of the Western world.

Apparently, the original idea was to make sex only a minor transgression. However, all levels of society almost immediately succumbed to the irresistible urge to feel guilty about perfectly normal sexual feelings. In effect this was the “new morality,” Dark Ages version.

In some ways a most frightening form. Sex rapidly became an emotional commodity to be consumed under the strictest prohibitions, if at all.

Like the famous insurance policy that pays off is the insured is killed by a cable car on the Fourth of July while carrying an Easter bunny, sexual relations came to be allowed only under the most rigid restrictions.

According to these forerunners of our modern moral guardians, sex was to be limited to married couples in bed, in the dark, fully clothed, ideally involving an important man and a frigid woman with just enough sperm dripping onto the lady’s private parts to bring on a joyless impregnation.

That was another challenge for the moral reformers. Since it sets a liberal tone toward sex, a major hatchet job was in order.

The Good Book was extensively distorted and misinterpreted to make it appear to endorse sexual repression.

Genesis was reinterpreted to make Adam and Eve seem like sinners who were evicted from the Garden of Eden for daring to engage in sexual intercourse.

 

SANITIZED

 

Later versions were further sanitized and Adam’s penis was replaced by the ever-present serpent hovering greedily around Eve’s pubic fig leaf.

The sexual purifiers smugly ignored reality: if God had not intended His first man and woman to copulate He would simply have molded their mortal clay a bit differently and left them nothing to work with.

Some of the changes were downright silly. In the Revised Version of the Bible of 1881, the word “whore” was changed to “harlot” and the term, “whoremonger” was replaced by “fornicator.” No exact figures are available to the number of souls saved by these semantic gymnastics.

The Bible was only the beginning. After emasculating this once lusty and vital Scripture, every other possible work of man, artistic and literary, were purged and distorted to eliminate any mention of rational human sexuality.

Fifteen hundred years ago the single most enduring principle of Western society was forged: SEX IS BAD.

From that moment to the present, hundreds of millions of innocent people have been brainwashed into believing a silly bit nonsense: sex is synonymous with sin.

Regrettably, no force on earth has been able to turn back the emotional calendar and the misconception goes on, constantly reinforced.

For more than a dozen centuries every persuasive force available has been harnessed to desexualize the most highly-sexed animal this planet has ever known—the human being. Their message is always the same and always untrue: sex, except under nearly impossible circumstances, is wicked.

One of the real tragedies of recent times is the attempted corruption of the human body. A small group of moral crusaders, working with that fevered devotion seen only in the mentally deranged, has been trying to convince everyone that the perfectly synchronized beautifully designed, elegantly planned mechanisms of their bodies are nasty, filthy, and horrid.

That psychological masterpiece which makes human reproduction unique has been distorted by those who should know better into a curse and a sickness.

 

MENSTRUATION

 

In reality menstruation signifies perfect health. The ounce or two of blood that is passed each month is the banner of a normal reproductive system. If blood is unclean, imagine what the moral crusaders can make of a nosebleed.

When it comes to sexual intercourse, the guerrilla fighters for purity bring on their big guns. Their favorite word is “dirty”—and they are wrong again.

By every test, sexual intercourse is probably the purest and daintiest activity that a man and woman can engage in, aside from being the most enjoyable.

The genitals themselves are normally free of harmful bacteria, the secretions are perfectly sterile, and the penis and vagina were obviously designed to be brought together in their own inimitable style.

By contrast, the throat of every person, including the anti-sex orators, is crammed with a dozen varieties of lethal bacteria.

These include the bugs that cause diphtheria, gonorrhea, strep throat, and rheumatic fever. If they want to start a crusade, it should probably begin in their own noses and mouths.

Actually the sexual reformers are on the wrong track. If they really hope to make men and women afraid of themselves, they might devote their attention to other organ systems.

Breathing offers a good opportunity. We take in good clean air and pervert it into bad breath! Only a few cynical mouthwash salesmen have jumped on that one, but there is plenty of room for moral education about how the body ruins God-given oxygen.

Sweating is another good area. Fifty thousand years ago human beings used their noses as much as their eyes. They could identify a stranger by his smell and could distinguish approaching animals and men by their specific odors.

The need for that talent has diminished somewhat but the human aroma still clings to man. It is now known as “body odor” and must be eliminated at all costs.

A human who smells like a human is headed for social and occupational disaster. In order to be accepted by the rest of his race, his breath must reek of carbolic acid, his armpits give off the scent of gardenias, and his skin exude hexachlorophene.

A few years ago chlorophyll tablets were developed to expunge once and for all every trace of human smells. (As a tribute to man’s sanity, they were tried and quickly discarded by all except fugitives wishing to avoid the bloodhounds.)

 

FRONTIER

 

Perhaps the last frontier for those reformers who want to protect us against ourselves is the digestive system. If they really concentrated they might be able to spoil the pleasure of eating for a hundred million or so fellow citizens. All they would need to do would be to explain, “When you take that beautiful food, provided for you by Heaven’s bounty, and put it into your body, it is attacked by filthy chemicals and changed into a green stinking mass. Do you know what that food finally becomes? Do you know what it is turned into?”

The lecture would have to stop at this point because the devoted moralists couldn’t say the word.

Every organ, every secretion, every cell of the human body was put there by nature, by the Creator, for a purpose.

The respiratory system, the digestive system, the sweat glands, all have a vital function in the preservation of the body. The sexual organs are no exception. For the past few hundred years, not more than a fleeting moment in the history of mankind, a strange collection of misguided do-gooders and moralizing misfits have tried to make us forget how we all arrived in this world. They miss the point. Ever since the beginning of the human race, sexual intercourse has been the most noble and wholesome of all man’s activities.

In spite of the shrill protests of those self-appointed moral guardians, nothing is going to change that.

Every woman, married or not, deserves the freedom to enjoy the ultimate expression of her sexual potential. With knowledge and determination and courage, that achievement is within her grasp.