“A free press can, of course, be good or bad, but, most certainly without freedom, the press will never be anything but bad.” Albert Camus
By Alex P. Vidal
IT is sad that the massacre on Charlie Hebdo magazine in
Paris, France on January 8 that left 12 people (mostly magazine employees
and two policemen) killed occurred a week before the scheduled visit of Pope
Francis in the Philippines, thus the incident was not totally discussed in mainstream Philippine media right away.
Scores were killed in a rampage in Jewish grocery store and along the highway as the gunmen, French nationals of Algerian descent, fled before they were killed by elite police forces.
Scores were killed in a rampage in Jewish grocery store and along the highway as the gunmen, French nationals of Algerian descent, fled before they were killed by elite police forces.
Daily Mail reported that satirical Charlie Hebdo has become a byword for offensive statements in France after taking several highly provocative swipes at Islam.
In its report after the massacre, Daily Mail wrote:
The magazine once named Prophet Mohammed as its guest editor, published
cartoons of the holy figure in the nude, and once renamed itself Sharia Hebdo
with the cover slogan '100 lashes if you don't die of laughter'.
The controversy began in 2006 when the publication reprinted now-infamous
cartoons of Prophet Mohammed by Danish artist Kurt Westergaard.
When the images originally appeared they lead to days of protests across
the Middle East and in Western cities. The decision to reprint the images
landed the then-editor in court under anti-terror laws, though he was later
acquitted.
BURNED
The Hebdo offices were burned to the ground in 2011 when attackers used
Molotov cocktails to start a blaze early in the morning of November 2.
There was nobody in the building at the time, and the target was instead thought to be the magazine's computer system, which was completely destroyed.
There was nobody in the building at the time, and the target was instead thought to be the magazine's computer system, which was completely destroyed.
Riot police were forced to stand guard outside the building for days
following the attack, as the editors took a defiant stance, choosing to reprint
the cartoon images multiple times.
In 2012 they again printed cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed as a deliberately
provocative gesture while violent protests were taking place across the Middle
East.
The following year the magazine's office again had to be surrounded by riot
officers after they published a cartoon booklet depicting the Prophet naked as
a baby and being pushed in a wheelchair.
On the final page of the booklet there was a note from the editor, Stephane
Charbonnier, saying the images were 'halal' because Muslims had worked on them,
and that they were factually accurate as they had been derived from descriptions
in the Koran.
MIXTURE
The satirical publication, widely seen as France's answer to Private Eye,
prides itself on a mixture of tongue-in-cheek reporting and investigative
journalism.
Hebdo's current office building has no notices on the door to prevent a
repeat of the attacks that have occurred in the past.
In an interview with De Volkskrant in January 2013, Mr. Charbonnier
revealed he had been placed under constant police protection for four months
after one of the cartoon issues was published.
He shrugged off criticism that he was only publishing the images to gain
notoriety for Hebdo, and insisted that he was instead defending the right to
free speech.
Mr. Charbonnier pointed out that the magazine had poked fun at feminism,
nuclear energy and homeland security, but the Islam issues always attracted the
most publicity. (Please read further: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/charlie-hebdo-attack-targets-democracy-and-the-west-a-1012072.html and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2901681/Hero-police-officer-executed-street-married-42-year-old-Muslim-assigned-patrol-Paris-neighbourhood-Charlie-Hebdo-offices-located.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment