“Leaders who are kind
of insecure or egocentric, they basically sabotage themselves.” John C. Maxwell
By
Alex P. Vidal
THE acts by the city councilors of boycotting
regular sessions and refusing to acknowledge their presiding officer since
November 2014 have become inimical to the interest of the people of Roxas City,
Capiz.
They’re tantamount to sabotage.
The Roxas city council has not officially passed
several important measures since that period because of their refusal to attend
the regular sessions.
Dadivas could not convene a regular session for lack
of quorum.
Just like a father who can’t start the dinner
because his children aren’t yet around to occupy their seats in the long table.
Citing “loss of confidence” in Vice Mayor Ronnie T.
Dadivas, Councilors Julius L. Abela, Erwin B. Sicad, Cesar S. Yap, Erlynne B.
Lim, Jennifer Anisco-Poliran, Matthew James Viterbo, Trina Marie
Almalbis-Ignacio, Jose Agdalipe, and Virgilio A. Santos Jr. have refused to
attend regular sessions as long as Dadivas is the presiding officer.
“Loss of confidence” is actually an oxymoron in this
circumstance since both the vice mayor and city councilors are elected
officials.
Sentiments are mere expressions and can’t be enacted
into a law or ordinance.
TRANSLATE
Sentiments can’t be translated into a bellicose act
that would jeopardize basic social services.
They can’t be used to sabotage an official proceeding
or regular session.
Appointed or co-terminus officials in the executive
department can go anytime for loss of confidence from their appointing official,
in this case either he is the mayor, the governor or the president.
Ironically, their rebellious acts began after
Dadivas had a falling out with Mayor Angel Alan B. Celino, an ally of these
brats.
In other words, politics or political bickering.
Because of politics, these city officials don’t give
a damn if they will sacrifice the good and welfare of the people who elected
them.
To add insult to taxpayers’ injury, they reportedly
held a “session” inside the office of Mayor Celino on January 3, 2015 without
Dadivas.
The city councilors did not only breach the separation
of power between the executive and legislative branches, but they also yielded to
the city mayor the city council’s jurisdiction as a co-equal branch.
A case of a lightning that strikes twice: their recalcitrance
or continuing defiance to attend the official or regular session, and their
deliberate move or brazenness to “convene” a session and “passed” resolutions
with the presiding officer in the executive territory.
Only members of the city mayor’s cabinet are supposed
to hold “sessions” inside the executive foxhole, not members of a legislature with
the same electoral mandate.
Politics must have reared its ugly face early last
year when the city councilors tried to unseat Dadivas as presiding officer in a
special session on Nov. 20, 2014.
DECLARE
They approved a resolution declaring loss of
confidence in Dadivas.
They were, however, stopped in their tracks by Regional
Trial Court Judge Ignacio Alajar who issued a TRO against the city councilors
after Dadivas sought a temporary restraining order (TRO)/injunction with the
court.
The court prohibited them from holding sessions
without the knowledge and authority of the presiding officer.
Dadivas has filed charges of usurpation of
authority, grave misconduct, conduct unbecoming of public officials, and
dereliction of duty against the city councilors before the Department of
Interior and Local Government (DILG).
Dadivas was contemplating also to file a petition
with the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to declare their position vacant.
A special election may be called if the Comelec will
take cognizance of the vice mayor’s petition “because they--with malice
aforethought--abandoned their duty as elected councilors of Roxas City.”
The city councilors, however, remained unfazed.
It’s so sad that politics has become the biggest
stumbling block in the city’s march to progress and unity.
They have become fragmented politically.
No less than Capiz-pride DILG chief Mar Roxas has
repeatedly enunciated the need for people of the city and province to unite
because of the “bigger battle” they will face in 2016, whatever that means.
No comments:
Post a Comment